Some people are more astute than others – and they’re raising questions about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and the killing of a young woman on a train.
The evidence, in my opinion, indicates that both were staged – both were fake – but both had a purpose in this war between Good and Evil – between the White Hats, and the Black Hats.
I could spend many hours analysing the available footage, and I have certainly spent several hours already looking through the following videos, pulling out freeze-frames such as this one. Others have done this as well – sometimes in greater detail.
I also posted this on my X channel ( @Knight5Wm )
In the case of the Kirk assassination, I have other questions as well, such as was this a really professional actor wearing a perfect mask, and equipped with devices such as a “blood squib” t hat could be triggered at a carefully pre-rehearsed moment?
Under the circumstances at this outdoor event in Utah, there would need to be a crew of people ensconced in the audience to pull it off.
But why?
And why would both sudden “deaths” occur?
It’s only my own speculation, but in this “war” that has been going on for years now, we’ve been told often enough that we are watching a movie.
The game of chess has been used as a metaphor as well.
And, frequently, we’ve been told the “White Hats” have the “Black Hats” in check, which means checkmate is inevitable.
However, checkmate is not the end of the game.
The Black Hats still have time to make moves between now, and when they are finally finished off – while we, who cannot see the board, can only speculate as to what moves the Black Hats will make – and what the White Hats must also do in order not to make any mistakes.
These next images explain, at least to me, exactly what’s going on and what the result will be.
Or at least what it should look like.
“CRIKEY!”
…as we say (or said) in New Zealand.
That Q post just came up from my archives as I was formatting this report. So bear with me as we consider it step by step.
Objective [end]: checkmate king. Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game?
The objective is to checkmate the king. We might see the king as Obama, but it’s much more than that. The objective is to finally rid the world of the families, including those who are dual human/reptile shape-shifting demons. But no, you don’t attack the “king” at the beginning of the game.
Do you attack and remove the pawns first?
Yes, you attack and remove the pawns first. And here, we’re talking about those who exist under the umbrella of the “Deep State.” Millions of them exist in agencies in America, and their counterparts in countries throughout the world. They have had literally decades to infiltrate their way into departments and think tanks and too many “charities” and foundations to even begin to name. etc etc ….
Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, and knights next?
(not including me, dammit, I’m on the winning side!).
Do you attack and remove queen mid to end?
I’d hazard a guess and say they’ve already removed the queen – Hillary Clinton – because her purpose, had she won in 2016, was to literally finish Obama’s groundwork and ensure we’d be in a nuclear war. She and her filthy beyond-Satanic assholes would’ve been safely underground.
Except that Trump by his election as President, “trumped” that, and she was arrested, tried, and hung at Gitmo.
Is the game being played both public and private?
Well, some of us – perhaps hundreds of thousands – are aware of both being in play. But that still leaves millions who know nothing of either.
“Do emotions affect critical thinking?”
Damn right. In my case, that’s a resounding YES! I get frustrated, angry, bitchy, despondent, pissed off, shitty-livered and all of the above in a heartbeat – unless I remember to take a deep breath, get a grip, and remind myself that….and this is a big BUT…
BUT I am NOT playing the game.
I am just a bloody spectator. So get over yourself, and leave it to the Big Boys.
Y’see, the “Big Boys” – which means whoever is involved in the anonymous group that comprises the White Hats – must have had many years to plot and plan and literally war-game multiple scenarios in order to win the “game.” And, fundamentally, if you’re faced with a chess board as big as a planet, it’s vitally important to wake up the, unfortunately heretofore, ignorant civilians – of which there are billions.
How do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]?
If you were an evil SOB, I’d say you’d have to frighten or scare them into compliance with your agenda, which is exactly what the perpetrators (traitors) did on 911 – of which today is yet another anniversary. With holograms of planes, the use of Directed Energy Weapons, secreted military grade explosives, the assistance of a captured international news media, they murdered at least 3000 people.
However, if you’re a wargames military-minded person, or an anonymous committee, would you not consider using a page from their own playbook, with really good intentions, in which nobody really dies?
If you can awaken as many as 80 per cent of the population, in this case America, then out of chaos, which is inevitable in any war, the survivors will be far better equipped to begin the rebuilding process.
This recovering and rebuilding has happened after all previous wars, but the big difference between then, and now, is that the Evil side which started those wars, also controlled the following recovery. There’s no point in going into detail. Suffice to say they understood how to manipulate the many ways we humans think, act and believe.
In my assessment, the White Hats also understand that in order to put an end to the Evil agenda and their control of the world and its people, the White Hats have chosen to use truly shocking tactics themselves to bring about an essential Great Awakening.
I’ll conclude this part by saying I was indeed deeply shocked when I first saw the Kirk assassination, reacting emotionally and believing the worst. Nevertheless, time went by, and I have receieved or looked for other records.
The following links will now enable you to do your own further research.
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/oSHAbm0Encmz
And a quote from the next link about the Kirk “assassination”- which is a truly well crafted report.
“Also, I decided to look up Hollywood effects used for shooting scenes. Here’s what I found. “Squib.” Here’s one site that talks about gushing blood for bullet wound effects:”
This post really deserves a donation – Just Sayin’.
With Love,
Sincerely,
Michael Knight.
Or if you prefer a check,
Michael Knight, 116 Swofford Rd, Mossyrock, WA. 98564.
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly
Leave a Reply